The Heatley Saga Continues
July 3rd, 2009 by MikeGenerally, I regard the writings of David Pollak, the Sharks beat writer, as close to gospel as you can get. And as he had written several times in the recent past, Dany (What’s Up With the Spelling) Heatley coming to the Sharks wasn’t going to happen. But in his most recent post, he admits the possibility of Heatley to the Sharks may not be as remote now as it once was. The $4M payment to Heatley on July 1 means that any potential trade partners wouldn’t have to shell out, making the prospect that much more attractive.
The flip side is the cap situation. As Mr. Plank has amply described at Fear the Fin, the Sharks are once again near the cap ceiling. This essentially means that any deal for Heatley would have to be at least cap neutral. The Sens have more players signed at approximately $55M, so they might be able to take a million or two, but certainly not more than that. And given that the Sharks still have players to sign in order to get to a proper active roster figure, that means only top salary players make sense to go the other way. Trading Ehrhoff, Vlasic, and Lukowich might be about the same cap hit as Heatley, but then the Sharks would need to sign two more players for the already paltry $2-3M the Sharks have left under the cap.
I’m burying the lead here- this means the Sharks have to be offering a deal that includes Patrick Marleau or Evgeni Nabokov. Considering the Sens got Pascal Leclaire at the deadline and the Sharks don’t have an obvious #1 to step in this year, I think it’s highly likely that Marleau is the one. Marleau, Ehrhoff, and a pick maybe?
Not that I’m supporting such a proposal. Heatley clearly is damaged goods, and the fact that he bitched about wanting to be traded, then didn’t waive his NMC to go to the Oilers certainly doesn’t make him look good. Even the most charitable explanation- that the Rangers and Sharks made decent proposals that he preferred - still makes him look like a punk. Funny thing is, this is one of the very few times we’ve seen a opposing player actively favor the Sharks (Dan Boyle avoiding Atlanta doesn’t count).
However, the question remains, do the Sharks really need this brand of headache? 40-50 goals, especially if Joe is there setting him up, is a difficult thing to pass up. But I still say no. Too many questions and too much money in this economic climate is asking for trouble.
Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »







